Where is "the fox"?

At the time of the original investigation, there was no evidence of underground structures. The newly discovered passage runs below the debris field and leads to an abandoned warehouse that has been unused for years. Official sources have so far been cautious:

“The original investigations were based on the knowledge available at the time. If further clarification is needed as a result of new finds, we will consider re-examining the situation.”

One question arises: why has a tunnel like this only appeared in the plans now? Was its existence deliberately covered up?

Accident or targeted action?

The official version of events states that the explosion was caused by a chemical reaction that developed through a series of unfortunate circumstances. The fox and several other individuals were subsequently pronounced dead, although no positive identifications could be made because of the contamination of the bodies by the chemicals.

However, some observers question why the case was closed so quickly. Particularly explosive: Special Agent Kathleen Mae, the then-field commander, is said to have actively worked to close the case quickly. This may have been standard procedure – but in light of the new evidence, it could also suggest that certain aspects of the case were deliberately left untouched.

Who had a motive?

If the explosion was not just a tragic accident, who might have had an interest in the fox going missing?

• Criminal networks: Was the fox exposed to a threat during his mission? If he was exposed, he could have been deliberately eliminated.
• Internal conflicts of interest: Did the Fox have information that was too explosive for some groups? In such cases, it is not uncommon for a case to be closed faster than would normally be the case.
• His own decision: Did the Fox possibly stage his own death? If he knew he was in danger – or was even involved in questionable shenanigans – fleeing might have been the safest option.

Officials have so far rejected such speculation:

“The FBI is continuously working to examine all relevant aspects of a case. At present, there is no evidence of internal irregularities or deliberate manipulation of the investigation.”

An open chapter in uncertain times

Whether the new evidence will lead to an official reopening of the investigation remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the discovery of the tunnel has now opened up the possibility, previously overlooked, that the fox may have survived the explosion.

If so, only one question remains: where did he go – and why?

These questions take on even more significance as the world finds itself in the midst of an unprecedented crisis. In recent weeks, more than half of all satellites in Earth orbit have been destroyed or severely damaged for reasons that are still unknown. The sudden failure of global communication, navigation and surveillance systems has caught many nations off guard and thrown key infrastructure into chaos. While the international situation remains tense, the massive disruption seems, paradoxically, to have so far prevented open conflict between major powers.

But it is precisely in times like these that a fundamental question arises: Can and should we trust the government?

When files are closed, information withheld and questions left unanswered, is it really to protect the public – or is it just to cover up mistakes and manoeuvres?

Conclusion: If the state withholds such information, how can people rely on being informed about everything important in this crisis? And how long can we continue to trust that the truth will come to light when the mechanisms of power continue to operate in the shadows?